
Originally Posted by
brdad
This seems to be the natural progression of caching. Maine, as usual, is just behind the curve.
As it gets harder to find impressive locations and cachers get acustomed to a "typical" hide, a percentage of cache hiders will up the ante by hiding tougher and tougher puzzle caches and often hide smaller caches which can be stuffed into tight corners at less visially appealing locations. Ask a cacher from the <A href="http://"http://www.geocaching.com/seek/nearest.aspx?origin_lat=37.759881&origin_long=-122.437392&dist=25" target=_blank>San Fransisco where there are over 1700 caches within 25 miles. How many of those do you suppose are ammo boxes?
I'm not knocking puzzle caches or micros. I've always promoted variety in caches. I hid Maine's first puzzle cache. I hid Maine's 3rd (I think) micro. But odds are, we are heading in the same direction as other areas. Hopefully, not as quickly!
.
This may be so . . . but I'm still convinced that there are a lot of untapped locations for regular ol' caches and moreover there are still new ways of hiding caches without having to resort to the usual geostick pile. I've got a couple of ideas in fact that I'm working on right now for a future cache that should prove to be as fun to create as it should be to find.
And personally, Brdad I consider you the King of the Master Hides . . . I still think you've got a few more good ones left in you without having to resort to puzzles.
Incidentally . . . while micros and puzzle caches are not my favorites, I do like to do them both occasionally and hope that folks don't stop putting them out as I am convinced that these most definitely have their place -- it was just that I was lamenting the fact that it just seems that lately there have been a ton of puzzle caches.
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but the realization that there is something more important than fear."
"Death is only one of many ways to die."