Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: When puzzle cache help goes too far

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    6,059

    Default

    It's a shame they did away with allowing additional logging requirements on caches. While photos can be cheated, they are still a better form of proof you were there IMO. And digital cameras good enough for cache logs can be had for much less than a GPSr nowadays, not to mention a fair amount of cell phones have cameras as well..
    Last edited by brdad; 11-20-2010 at 08:48 PM.
    DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!

    "The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    [x, y, z, t]
    Posts
    668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CARoperPhotography View Post
    Dont understand why photos are no longer acceptable as a requirement. It pretty much ensures that the majority of earthcaches can be logged by arm chair cachers who never even set foot at GZ...

    ... I'd love to see Groundspeak allow me to use a SPOT Text message from a PN-60 with cord link as a requirement! That would ensure that the cacher logging the cache truly was there.
    No, it won't :P
    Moo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •