vb:literal>

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74

Thread: Article: Paperless caching all Maine caches for GSAK

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, Georgia
    Posts
    3,893

    Default Article: Paperless caching all Maine caches for GSAK

    There is just one problem with that. This is YOUR PQ and for people who have done a lot of caches those numbers will be much different if the query includes all of your found caches as well. I like to keep my found caches in a separate query. Also one other thing,does this query include child waypoints? If that is the case then it will be a lot more than that for each query. I usually try to keep mine around 470 or less so it will include all those child waypoints as well. Just my thoughts.
    Just smile it won't crack your face

    The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four persons is
    suffering from some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best
    friends -- if they're okay, then it's you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    6,343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haffy View Post
    There is just one problem with that. This is YOUR PQ and for people who have done a lot of caches those numbers will be much different if the query includes all of your found caches as well. I like to keep my found caches in a separate query. Also one other thing,does this query include child waypoints? If that is the case then it will be a lot more than that for each query. I usually try to keep mine around 470 or less so it will include all those child waypoints as well. Just my thoughts.
    As I posted in another thread, I think this was for All Maine caches, not just unfound, but I could be wrong. The argument about child waypoints is somewhat invalid since you can get 500 caches in one PQ regardless of how many child waypoints there are.
    DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!

    "The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,972

    Post These dates would work.....

    If you are brand new to caching or just moved to Maine and had no finds. As Haffy pointed out, those dates are only really accurate for just the cacher who prepared them. I started caching in December of 04, and as of this morning I have found 1584 caches placed in Maine. My first PQ dates are 05-01-00 thru 09-15-06 and contains 491 active caches. I'm not too worried about being that close to 500 since these are the oldest placed caches in Maine, and they are usually archived and not disabled.

    Your dates will vary depending upon how many caches are active in Maine, how many Maine placed caches you have found, and when they were placed.
    Why not live life like it is your last day....instead of pretending to be a member of the Peter Pan Club and believing you will be around forever.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    6,343

    Default

    But these dates can work for anyone using GSAK. I get all the caches for the stats, but I also use the same database for caching. All you have to do is filter out found and placed caches. I have to filter out archived as well since they are in the same database.

    The biggest benefit of only having unfound caches in your database if to cut down on the number of PQs. But except for the power cachers, there probably is not much difference between a set of PQs with all the caches and the unfound. Foe example, 10 PQs will get me every cache in the state, but I still need 8 PQs for the 3723 unfound Maine caches I have in my database.

    I like having all the Maine caches in one database. I don't have to load the web page to look up old caches or to post a link to them online.

    I also keep several other databases, including one of my finds, but that has out of state caches as well.

    It's all a matter of what works for you.
    Last edited by brdad; 08-22-2009 at 07:56 PM.
    DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!

    "The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    America
    Posts
    2,578

    Default

    OK I have updated the dates again. A bunch of caches have been archived so here are the new numbers.

    We are still at 7 PQ's to get all the caches.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    3,529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekidokai View Post
    OK I have updated the dates again. A bunch of caches have been archived so here are the new numbers.

    We are still at 7 PQ's to get all the caches.
    Did I miss something or did you forget to put in the "new numbers"?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    America
    Posts
    2,578

    Default

    I just checked and the new dates and numbers are there.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    3,529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekidokai View Post
    I just checked and the new dates and numbers are there.
    Well, yes they are there and I am a dumbi! Point me to the front page and then the articles on the left and perhaps I would have found it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    6,343

    Default

    That is one flaw with this new article system. You have to go to the front page to see the actual article, or someone needs to post a link in the comment thread.

    Paperless caching all Maine caches for GSAK

    Nice to see you post Mike, you have been too quiet.
    DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!

    "The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    3,529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brdad View Post
    That is one flaw with this new article system. You have to go to the front page to see the actual article, or someone needs to post a link in the comment thread.

    Paperless caching all Maine caches for GSAK

    Nice to see you post Mike, you have been too quiet.
    Thank you brdad - that would have made me click and see it. Probably not so much dumb as numb sometimes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •