Just recently I received a blank found log. What are your thoughts on this sort of thing? My first response is a note asking for a proper log. Then possibly a deleted log.
vb:literal>
Just recently I received a blank found log. What are your thoughts on this sort of thing? My first response is a note asking for a proper log. Then possibly a deleted log.
I'd really rather not cache, but I am helpless in the grip of my compulsion!
As one who is not noted for extensive log entries, I'm inclined to ignore blank logs.
Perhaps it's an error - someone clicked on a button too early?
And it's rare that someone wouldn't even leave a "TFTC" entry. I'd ignore it. (But I'm also curious enough to check this person's other log entries to see if this is a pattern... )
If they found the cache and signed the log in the cache, it's a find in my book.
Can you leave a blank log? I just tried it and it would not let me. I could not even just use spaces.
I have left only a smiley before, but never nothing. If someone wrote a log in white text, you would not see it on the cache page (but would in your email.)
Seems odd, maybe there is a glitch in the system. Care to share the GCID?
DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!
"The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."
**********************************************
Moo
Got a note back from the cacher and it seems there was some sort of glitch in the system. I believe it is corrected now.
I guess the biggest thing is that logs seem to be getting shorter and shorter. I am not a great log writer myself, but at the same time my average log length is decent.
I'd really rather not cache, but I am helpless in the grip of my compulsion!
DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!
"The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."
DNFTT! DNFTT! DNFTT!
"The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it..."
sure, that's why you use your own algorithm. First you assign a relevancy weight to the people based on how they like/don't like caches you like/don't like. Then you scale all ratings based on this weight and pick the best one. Similar to other recommendation engines for shopping, movies, music, websites...
Moo